Discovered during live verification of #10b Scenario 3: the switch
in ensurePeered had no case for needs_attention, so it fell through
to performHandshake. Because the /peer/accept idempotent-200-no-update
safeguard covers needs_attention on the inbound side, the remote
returned 200 without writing the new secret, and performHandshake
transitioned the local peer to 'active' on the 200 response — auto-
healing a state that requires admin intervention.
Affected paths: sendCallRelay non-blocking warm-up (used by typing
relay); any future caller of ensurePeered on a needs_attention peer.
Not affected: resolvePendingPeers (already filters on status='pending').
Fix: explicit case 'needs_attention' returning { status: 'rejected',
error }. Caller observes the rejection and does not advance state.
Jannis Braun
911c7e3479