test(auth): polish register handler — comment, test isolation, +1 coverage
Quality-review polish on Task 11: 1. One-line comment near the federatedRegistrationOpen default behavior noting that the missing-row case is unreachable post-migration but falls federation-closed defensively (asymmetric with registrationOpen which falls back to env config — by design). 2. The "federated gate blocks token registration" test now sets ONLY federatedRegistrationOpen=0, isolating the federated-gate-alone effect rather than a both-gates-closed compound. 3. New test: open registration + revoked token → 201 (silently ignored). Locks the spec §5.7 invariant "no validation when registration is open" against future "let's just validate it for safety" regressions. 4. auth.md prose explicitly notes that federated stub upgrade and new- account paths do NOT enter redeemInvite — surfacing the structural enforcement of spec §1.3 "tokens never unlock federated creation".
This commit is contained in:
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ describe('POST /api/auth/register — federation gate split', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
it('federated registration: blocked even with valid token when federatedRegistrationOpen=false', async () => {
|
||||
testDb.update(schema.instanceSettings)
|
||||
.set({ registrationOpen: 0, federatedRegistrationOpen: 0 })
|
||||
.set({ federatedRegistrationOpen: 0 })
|
||||
.where(eq(schema.instanceSettings.id, 1))
|
||||
.run();
|
||||
const token = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv';
|
||||
@@ -454,4 +454,37 @@ describe('POST /api/auth/register — federation gate split', () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(res.statusCode).toBe(403);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('open registration: revoked/expired token is silently ignored, registration still succeeds', async () => {
|
||||
// Spec §5.7: when registration is open, the token field is not even
|
||||
// validated. A revoked token in the request body must NOT block signup
|
||||
// and must NOT be consumed.
|
||||
const adminId = ADMIN_ID;
|
||||
const token = 'r'.repeat(22);
|
||||
testDb.insert(schema.inviteLinks).values({
|
||||
id: 'inv-revoked',
|
||||
token,
|
||||
name: 'revoked',
|
||||
createdBy: adminId,
|
||||
createdAt: Date.now(),
|
||||
maxUses: 10,
|
||||
usedCount: 0,
|
||||
expiresAt: null,
|
||||
revokedAt: Date.now(), // revoked!
|
||||
}).run();
|
||||
|
||||
const res = await app.inject({
|
||||
method: 'POST',
|
||||
url: '/api/auth/register',
|
||||
payload: { username: 'eve', password: 'password123', inviteToken: token },
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(res.statusCode).toBe(201);
|
||||
|
||||
// Revoked invite still revoked — usedCount unchanged, no redemption row.
|
||||
const inv = testDb.select().from(schema.inviteLinks).where(eq(schema.inviteLinks.id, 'inv-revoked')).get();
|
||||
expect(inv?.usedCount).toBe(0);
|
||||
expect(inv?.revokedAt).not.toBeNull();
|
||||
const reds = testDb.select().from(schema.inviteRedemptions).where(eq(schema.inviteRedemptions.inviteId, 'inv-revoked')).all();
|
||||
expect(reds).toHaveLength(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ export async function authRoutes(app: FastifyInstance): Promise<void> {
|
||||
const registrationOpen = instanceRow?.registrationOpen !== null && instanceRow?.registrationOpen !== undefined
|
||||
? instanceRow.registrationOpen === 1
|
||||
: config.registrationOpen;
|
||||
// instanceRow is guaranteed by ensureDefaults() (migrate.ts) to have id=1
|
||||
// post-boot, with federatedRegistrationOpen NOT NULL DEFAULT 1. The optional
|
||||
// chain is defensive against the impossible-in-production case of a missing
|
||||
// row (e.g., a hand-cleared DB) — falls open-closed rather than open-open
|
||||
// for federation, which is the safer default.
|
||||
const federatedRegistrationOpen = instanceRow?.federatedRegistrationOpen === 1;
|
||||
|
||||
// Optional invite token. Only meaningful for the local-closed path; ignored
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user